House GOP navigates IVF backlash by offering symbolic measures with no force of law

Trending 1 month ago

WASHINGTON — Last month, Rep. Michelle Steel, a two-term Republican successful a competitory territory successful Orange County, California, co-sponsored nan Life at Conception Act pinch 124 different GOP backers, signaling solidarity pinch nan party’s influential anti-abortion-rights base.

But past week, erstwhile nan Alabama Supreme Court ruled that embryos created arsenic portion of successful vitro fertilization are children, it sparked a governmental dilemma for Steel. IVF has wide support, and her critics were speedy to statement that nan measure she backed could successful effect nationalize nan Alabama ruling and frighten IVF, a process successful which unused embryos are often discarded. The U.S. Supreme Court’s blimpish mostly overturned Roe v. Wade successful 2022, giving Congress nan powerfulness to restrict reproductive rights.

Steel responded by co-sponsoring a nonbinding resolution to state her support for IVF.

“As personification who struggled pinch infertility and personally witnessed nan occurrence of IVF, I powerfully judge that IVF should stay protected and accessible,” she said successful a statement.

But nan Steel-backed Life astatine Conception Act says ineligible protections for quality beings return effect astatine “the infinitesimal of fertilization.” She besides hasn’t signed connected to nan Access to Family Building Act, which has only Democratic sponsors and would found tangible ineligible protections for assisted reproductive exertion for illustration IVF.

Steel’s agency didn’t respond to messages seeking remark connected really she reconciles her pro-IVF stance pinch backing nan Life astatine Conception Act.

Democrat Derek Tran, a seasoned and user authorities lawyer moving for Steel’s seat, called Steel a “fraud” for claiming to support IVF. Unlike her, he said he supports nan Access to Family Building Act.

“She continues to spill retired lies,” Tran said successful an interview. “Just 3 weeks ago, she signed connected to nan Life astatine Conception bill. This is nan 2nd clip she’s done that. And now she’s saying that she’s pro-IVF erstwhile nan Life astatine Conception measure is thing but. So she still is conscionable spilling retired lies successful bid to get voters.”

Rep. Michelle Steel, R-Calif.Rep. Michelle Steel, R-Calif., connected Capitol Hill successful February 2023.Alex Brandon / AP file

A akin dilemma is facing Republicans astir nan country.

An Axios/Ipsos poll recovered that 66% of U.S. adults reason designating IVF embryos arsenic children, while 31% support it.

House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., who built a estimation arsenic a dogged societal blimpish earlier he won nan gavel, wouldn’t opportunity Thursday whether he favors a measure to legally protect IVF. Asked whether he believes discarding embryos is murder, he didn’t straight respond.

“Look, I judge successful nan sanctity of each quality life. Always have,” he said. “And because of that I support IVF and its availability.” He said nan exertion has brought astir an estimated 8 cardinal births, adding that he has “many adjacent friends” who person utilized IVF. 

“It needs to beryllium readily available. It needs to beryllium thing that each American supports. And it needs to beryllium handled successful an ethical manner,” he said, lamenting that there’s “a batch of misunderstanding” astir wherever Republicans guidelines connected it.

Numerous Republicans successful competitory districts person taken to supporting symbolic resolutions successful nan aftermath of nan IVF controversy.

The Steel solution is co-signed by Reps. Lori Chavez-DeRemer, R-Ore., and Juan Ciscomani, R-Ariz., who besides correspond competitory districts. Another group of Republicans has signed connected to a abstracted resolution that likewise expresses support for IVF, including Reps. Don Bacon of Nebraska, David Schweikert of Arizona, Jen Kiggans of Virginia and Anthony D’Esposito and Nick LaLota, some of New York. All 8 correspond districts President Joe Biden won successful 2020, making them apical Democratic targets successful nan autumn election.

Unlike Steel, nan different Biden-district Republicans didn’t sponsor nan Life astatine Conception Act. But they besides haven’t supported nan measure to codify protections for IVF arsenic they locomotion nan statement betwixt their blimpish guidelines and plaything voters who favour reproductive rights.

In nan Senate, a measure to protect IVF that was pushed by Sen. Tammy Duckworth, D-Ill., and Democrats stalled erstwhile Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith, R-Miss., objected, saying it went excessively far.

Democrats opportunity nan swing-district Republicans will beryllium enablers of a GOP schedule to barroom abortion and IVF if they’re fixed powerfulness successful nan election.

“The Alabama Supreme Court did what a batch of Republican House members person wanted to do,” Rep. Suzan DelBene, D-Wash., who chairs Democrats’ run arm, said Monday connected MSNBC. “They supported authorities called nan Life astatine Conception Act, which is akin to what nan Alabama tribunal decided, and now each these Republicans are trying to travel retired saying they support IVF, but nary of them are consenting to support authorities to really do that.”

“They want a nationalist abortion prohibition that impacts contraception, IVF, truthful galore different things,” she said. “Our authorities are astatine risk.”

Sahil Kapur

Sahil Kapur is simply a elder nationalist governmental newsman for NBC News.